Can a con ever be convinced he is wrong?

Cons won't believe the "liberal media", the "activist judges", and mainstream historians and economists. Now it seems they won't trust government sources (census, bureau of economic analyses, whitehouse.org, department of labor, etc) or scientific organizations like NASA, the American Meteorological Society, or the U.S. Geological Survey.





What source will cons accept besides Fox News?





I will not cite THREE examples.

Can a con ever be convinced he is wrong?
You can lead a conservative to logic, but you can't make him think.
Reply:don't confuse them with facts
Reply:OK, you've thrown down the gauntlet, so let me prove that Cons are a lot more sophisticated and shrewd than you give us credit for.





Let's start with economists. The economists advising Ronald Reagan (Galbraith, Samuelson) told him the USSR was economically rock solid, and was growing faster than the U.S. Ha!!! Reagan knew better. Score one for the Cons.





NASA: did you know that NASA is convinced global warming is due to simple increased solar radiation? Other planets such as Mars are warmer too. NASA scientific data has shown most of the changes of temperature are due to changes in the Sun. Mars, Jupiter, Saturn, and Pluto all have global warming right now.





NASA has said that great temperature changes are normal. Just 10,000 years ago, the earth warmed up remarkably in less than 20 years. There were not many people around at that time. Back around 750AD, Greenland was so warm it was colonized, and had crops growing and livestock grazing in meadows.


NASA:


"Rapid changes between ice ages and warm periods (called interglacials) are recorded in the Greenland ice sheet. Occurring over ONE OR TWO DECADES, the warming of the Earth at the end of the last ice age "





http://earthobservatory.nasa.gov/study/p





THIS GLACIER DIDN'T EXIST 7,000 YEARS ago. And that was after the Ice Age.


"A few thousand years ago, there were no glaciers here at all"..."Back then we would have been standing in the middle of a forest"


http://service.spiegel.de/cache/internat





Russian Expert Predicts Global Cooling from 2012


http://www.mosnews.com/news/2006/02/06/g





How is it going for you, big guy? Still so convinced Cons are just ignoring facts? The truth is, we know far better than Libs which facts are real, and which are concocted statistics, manipulated to direct the gullible and naive American public. I'd rather believe Bill O'Reilly than Hillary Clinton. Most rational people would too.





So, I'll listen to NASA. I'll listen to any credible organization that isn't being bribed or coerced to follow the Liberal directives.





Ask yourself one question: the evidence I have presented is never revealed by the Liberal media, is it? Don't you realize they are just playing all for fools? Do you want to spend you life having scum like George Soros laughing his @ss off at you?
Reply:I think a con on Yahoo can be convinced they are wrong just as easily as a liberal/dem can be convinced they are wrong.